Law Offices Of Greg Enos

Galveston divorce lawyer | Galveston divorce attorney | Child custody lawyers Galveston

281-333-3030

Divorce and Child Custody

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • PAYMENT
  • About
    • Greg B. Enos
    • Paul Enos
    • Shandon Tonry
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • Galveston Divorce Attorneys
  • Divorce
    • Uncontested Divorce
    • Divorce Process
    • Divorce FAQS
    • Divorce for Business Owners
    • Divorce for Physicians and Dentists
    • Property Division
    • The Family House
    • Taxes & Divorce
    • Alimony
    • Adultery
  • Custody
    • Child Custody Questions
    • Child Support
    • Custody Evaluation
    • International / Interstate Custody Disputes
    • When a Child Can Choose?
  • Mongoose
  • Blogs
  • Links
    • Links
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • The Mongoose
    • School Districts
    • Galveston Co. Courts
    • Harris Co. Courts
  • Videos

Feb 5

New Ethics Opinion Agrees With Me: No Part Time Associate Judges

A brand new ethics opinion from the Texas Center for the Judiciary makes clear what I have argued for years: it is not ethical to allow a part-time Associate Judge to also practice law.  The opinion states:

Ethics Opinion Number 296 ( 2013 )
PRACTICE OF LAW BY PART-TIME JUDGE

FACTS: An attorney has been appointed as a part-time family law associate judge by the district judge. The associate judge continues to represent family law clients before other district courts of that county and before courts in other surrounding counties.

QUESTIONS: May a part-time family law associate judge, appointed by a court, represent family law clients before any of the other courts
1. in that county?
2. in surrounding counties?

ANSWER:
The committee answers Question 1 “No.”
The committee answers Question 2 with a qualified “No.”

DISCUSSION: A part-time associate judge appointed by a court is governed by the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 6D.  As stated in Canon 6D(1)1, certain portions of the Code of Judicial Conduct do not apply to part-time judges, including the prohibition set out in Canon 4G that a judge may not practice law.
However, the following provisions of the Code do apply to a part-time judge, and are relevant to the stated inquiry:
Canon 6D(2) states that a part-time judge “should not practice law in the court which he or she serves or in any court subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the court which he or she serves, or act as a lawyer in a proceeding in which he or she has served as a commissioner, master, magistrate, or referee, or in any other proceeding related thereto.”

Canon 2A provides that “a judge . . . should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”

Canon 2B provides that “[a] judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge….”

Canon 4A provides that “a judge shall conduct all of the judge’s extra-judicial activities so that they do not (1) cast reasonable doubt on the judge’s capacity to act impartially as a judge….”

Canon 4D provides, “A judge shall refrain from financial and business dealings that tend to reflect adversely on the judge’s impartiality, interfere with the proper performance of the judicial duties, exploit his or her judicial position, or involve the judge in frequent transactions with lawyers or person likely to come before the court on which the judge serves….”

The committee believes that it is inconsistent with Canons 6D(2), 2A, 2B, 4A and 4D(1) for a part-time family law associate judge, appointed by a court, to represent clients before any court of the county in which he or she is appointed and before courts in the counties surrounding the county in which he or she is appointed, provided that those courts are “subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the court which he or she serves”. If a part-time judge chooses to practice before any other court, the judge must be aware of the obligations under the Code of Judicial Conduct, and practice consistent with these obligations, especially Canons 2A, 2B, 4A and 4D(1).
The roles of advocate and impartial judge are in opposition to each other, and a judge may not use the authority of judicial position to advance one’s private interests as an advocate. As stated in Opinion 288 (2003),

A built-in dilemma exists in our justice system when a part-time judge also maintains a law practice. Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Responsibility a lawyer has an obligation to zealously represent his client within the bounds of the law. When that lawyer also serves as a judge, however, his [or her] duty as a judge is to be impartial and to promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. The Committee stresses to all part-time judges to keep this conflict in mind when choosing to accept representation.

Category:Uncategorized | Tags: Judicial ethics

Recent Posts

  • Who Moves Out of the House During Divorce?
  • How to Prepare for Your First Divorce Mediation Session
  • Donors Hold Off on Donation Until Beto O’Rourke Decides to Run
  • Laudanum
  • Election 2018

Categories

  • Agreement Incident to Divorce
  • Alcoholism and Drug Addiction
  • Amicus Attorneys
  • Attorney Disqualification
  • Attorney's Fees
  • BAKER STREET BAZAAR
  • Book Review
  • Business Valuation
  • Characterization
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Community Property
  • Constitutional Rights
  • Court Appointment Abuse
  • Crimes in the courtroom
  • Criminal law and family law
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Dismissal summary judgment
  • Divorce
  • Domestic Violence
  • Doug York
  • E-Filing
  • E-Filing and Service
  • Election 2018
  • Electronic Evidence
  • Enforcement
  • Enos Legal Directories
  • Evidence
  • First Divorce
  • Galveston County
  • Gary Polland
  • Good Judges
  • Grandparents' custody and visitation
  • Harris County
  • Hearsay
  • Illegal Evidence
  • Injunctions
  • Injury Settlements in Divorce
  • Intervention
  • Judge Alicia Franklin
  • Judge Denise Pratt
  • Judge Problems
  • Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc
  • Julia Maldonado
  • Jury Trial
  • Law firm billing
  • Local Legal News
  • Mandamus
  • Modification
  • Mongoose Blog
  • Orders entry nunc pro tunc
  • Pleadings
  • Poetry and Prose
  • Politics and elections
  • Possession and visitation
  • Property Division
  • Recusal
  • Reimbursement
  • Religion and Philosophy
  • Rules of Civil Procedure
  • Separate Property
  • Spousal Maintenance (Alimony)
  • Ted Cruz
  • Temporary Orders
  • Tracing Separate Property
  • Trial
  • trial by consent
  • TRUMP REALITY
  • Uncategorized
  • Undivided Assets
  • US Supreme Court
  • Useful forms
  • Valuation
  • Venue and Transfer
  • Visitation and Possession
  • Waste / Fraud
  • Witnesses

Archives

  • April 2022
  • April 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • February 2016
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
    • Home
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • Site Map
    facebook twitter

    17207 Feather Craft Lane, Webster, Texas 77598

    © 2013 The Enos Law Firm, PC. All rights Reserved.

    Popup Content