Law Offices Of Greg Enos

Galveston divorce lawyer | Galveston divorce attorney | Child custody lawyers Galveston

281-333-3030

Divorce and Child Custody

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About
    • Greg B. Enos
    • Paul Enos
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • Galveston Divorce Attorneys
  • Divorce
    • Uncontested Divorce
    • Divorce Process
    • Divorce FAQS
    • Divorce for Business Owners
    • Divorce for Physicians and Dentists
    • Property Division
    • The Family House
    • Taxes & Divorce
    • Alimony
    • Adultery
  • Custody
    • Child Custody Questions
    • Child Support
    • Custody Evaluation
    • International / Interstate Custody Disputes
    • When a Child Can Choose?
  • Mongoose
  • Blogs
  • Links
    • Links
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • The Mongoose
    • School Districts
    • Galveston Co. Courts
    • Harris Co. Courts
  • Videos

Archives for June 2013

Jun 5

Judicial candidates in Galveston County

Galveston County will very likely complete its transition to being a county with all Republican judges next year and the few Democratic incumbents know it.  Here is the breakdown of who is running or not running: 306h Family District Court - Judge Jan Yarbrough is expected to retire but she is not officially confirmed she will not seek reelection.  Anne Darring and Jennifer Burnett are the only announced candidates on the Republican side. 212th District Court - Incumbent Judge Susan Criss has already said she will retire.  Now, it is rumored that she may well resign this Fall to run for the State Representative seat being vacated by the retiring Craig Eiland.  That district is clearly winnable by a Democrat and Criss would be trying to follow in the footsteps of her father, former Rep. Lloyd Criss.  A Criss resignation would allow Governor Perry to appoint someone to fill out the term.  The appointee would become the de facto incumbent and have big advantage in the 2014 ... Read More >

Post in: Uncategorized

Jun 5

The crime of witness tampering

The crime of tampering with a witness applies to both civil and criminal cases and can involve either offering or providing "any benefit" to the witness or acting to coerce a witness.  Witness tampering can involve influencing a witness to testify falsely, influencing a witness to avoid testifying or influencing a witness to not press criminal charges.  "Any benefit" is a very broad term and could include promises of money, assistance with a lawsuit or helping covering the costs of a move or vacation.  Case law summarized below shows that it does not take much to be considered coercion.  All lawyers should be very careful in dealing with witnesses, especially those witnesses who are crazy, who have a history of making false allegations or who tape record the promises and threats they receive about their testimony.  The best practice is to tell any potential witness,"I just want you to tell the truth," early and often. Section 36.05 of the Texas Penal Code states in part:  Sec. ... Read More >

Post in: Crimes in the courtroom, Trial, Witnesses

Jun 2

Trey Apffel Elected State Bar President!

Trey Apffel of League City won the run-off to be the State Bar of Texas President-Elect.  It is awesome to see such a good thing happen to one of the planet's truly fine human beings (and a great attorney).  Trey was in the middle of a medical malpractice jury trial in County Court No. 3 when Judge Dupuy was indicted and arrested.  The judge called the lawyers to the bench right after lunch and indicated he had to be gone that afternoon and might not be able to go forward the next day.  Sure enough, the judge had some other business to attend to and a mis-trial was declared. ... Read More >

Post in: Local Legal News

Jun 2

The Texas Constitution Has Two Guarantees to the Right to a Jury Trial

I recently argued to Judge David Farr that the amount of reimbursement due the community estate is not a jury question because reimbursement is once again an equitable remedy and historically, juries were not used in courts of equity.  Judge Farr went with the Pattern Jury Charge book but then the parties stipulated on the amount.  It turns out my argument was wrong because the Texas Constitution contains two provisions which guarantee the right to trial by jury (at least in district courts).Taylor v. Taylor, 63 S.W.3d 93, 99 (Tex. App. - Waco 2001, no pet.) provides this explanation:        Article I, section 15 is a part of our Bill of Rights. See TEX. CONST. art. I, § 15. It provides in pertinent part:   The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. The Legislature shall pass such laws as may be needed to regulate the same, and to maintain its purity and efficiency.       TEX. CONST. art. I, § 15. Article I, section 15 guarantees the right of trial by jury for those ... Read More >

Post in: Jury Trial

Jun 2

Important New Case on Waste in Divorce Cases is a Game Changer

A recent decision from the First Court of Appeals out of Judge Hellums' court (won by Michael Childs) provides a new twist to claims of waste or constructive fraud.  In Puntarelli v. Peterson, No. 01-11-01120-CV (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 14, 2013), the wife asked the age old question "where did all of the money he earned go?" The wife was awarded a $196,000 judgment for wasting community funds because the husband could not account for how he spent his significant income during the five years this informal marriage/divorce case was pending.  The important message from this case that should prompt almost all non-monied spouses to allege constructive fraud is this - the wife did not have to prove any specific improper transfers of community funds.  The wife merely had to show that the husband's expenses were much less than his income and then the burden shifted to the husband to show where the money went.  Proving how one spent money years ago is often not easy, but failure to ... Read More >

Post in: Divorce, Property Division, Waste / Fraud

Jun 2

When Does An Inmate Have The Right To Participate In Trial?

At some point, we all handle cases where the opposing party is incarcerated and pro se.  The recent case of Camp v. Camp, No. 07-11-00282-CV (Tex. App. - Amarillo 8/3/2012, no. pet.)(mem. op.) summarizes the law on when the inmate is entitled to be present at trial.     The Texas Supreme Court in the case of  In re Z.L.T., 124 S.W.3d 163, 165-6 (Tex. 2003)  also noted the factors courts should consider in making arrangements for the inmate to be brought to court or to participate in some alternate fashion (by telephone, deposition or even affidavit): Following the Seventh Circuit's decision in Stone v. Morris, 546 F.2d 730, 735-36 (1976), Texas courts of appeals have recognized a variety of factors that trial courts should consider when deciding whether to grant an inmate's request for a bench warrant. These factors include the cost and inconvenience of transporting the prisoner to the courtroom; the security risk the prisoner presents to the court and public; whether the prisoner's ... Read More >

Post in: Trial

Jun 2

File For a Mandamus If a Judge Refuses to Sign an Order Or Set a Hearing

The Houston First Court of Appeals granted a writ of mandamus against a trial judge who refused to set a civil case for trial in case of In re Harrell, No. 01-11-00760-CV (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 1/26/2013) (mem. op.)(orig. proc.).  The Court of Appeals stated:  A court of appeals may not prescribe the manner in which a trial court exercises its discretion, but it may, by mandamus, require a trial court to exercise its discretion in some manner.  A trial court may not arbitrarily halt proceedings in a pending case, and mandamus will lie to compel a trial court to entertain and rule on motions pending before it.  A trial court is required to consider and rule upon a motion within a reasonable time.   If a motion is properly filed and pending before a trial court, the act of considering and ruling upon that motion is ministerial, and mandamus may issue to compel the trial court to act. (citations omitted). ... Read More >

Post in: Judge Problems, Mandamus

Jun 2

A Quote to Give a Judge Who Feels Resolving a Case Quickly Is More Important Than a Fair Trial

The Supreme Court of Texas has stated: Although a goal of our system is to resolve lawsuits with "great expedition and dispatch and at the least expense," the supreme objective of the courts is "to obtain a just, fair, equitable and impartial adjudication of the rights of litigants under established principles of substantive law." This means that "convenience and economy must yield to a paramount concern for a fair and impartial trial." And basic to the right to a fair trial--indeed, basic to the very essence of the adversarial process--is that each party have the opportunity to adequately and vigorously present any material claims and defenses. Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. Bernal, 22 S.W.3d 425, 437 (Tex.2000)(citations omitted). ... Read More >

Post in: Judge Problems, Trial

Recent Posts

  • How to Prepare for Your First Divorce Mediation Session
  • Donors Hold Off on Donation Until Beto O’Rourke Decides to Run
  • Laudanum
  • Election 2018
  • The Large Airy Sitting Room

Categories

  • Agreement Incident to Divorce
  • Alcoholism and Drug Addiction
  • Amicus Attorneys
  • Attorney Disqualification
  • Attorney's Fees
  • BAKER STREET BAZAAR
  • Book Review
  • Business Valuation
  • Characterization
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Community Property
  • Constitutional Rights
  • Court Appointment Abuse
  • Crimes in the courtroom
  • Criminal law and family law
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Dismissal summary judgment
  • Divorce
  • Domestic Violence
  • Doug York
  • E-Filing
  • E-Filing and Service
  • Election 2018
  • Electronic Evidence
  • Enforcement
  • Enos Legal Directories
  • Evidence
  • First Divorce
  • Galveston County
  • Gary Polland
  • Good Judges
  • Grandparents' custody and visitation
  • Harris County
  • Hearsay
  • Illegal Evidence
  • Injunctions
  • Injury Settlements in Divorce
  • Intervention
  • Judge Alicia Franklin
  • Judge Denise Pratt
  • Judge Problems
  • Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc
  • Julia Maldonado
  • Jury Trial
  • Law firm billing
  • Local Legal News
  • Mandamus
  • Modification
  • Mongoose Blog
  • Orders entry nunc pro tunc
  • Pleadings
  • Poetry and Prose
  • Politics and elections
  • Possession and visitation
  • Property Division
  • Recusal
  • Reimbursement
  • Religion and Philosophy
  • Rules of Civil Procedure
  • Separate Property
  • Spousal Maintenance (Alimony)
  • Ted Cruz
  • Temporary Orders
  • Tracing Separate Property
  • Trial
  • trial by consent
  • TRUMP REALITY
  • Uncategorized
  • Undivided Assets
  • US Supreme Court
  • Useful forms
  • Valuation
  • Venue and Transfer
  • Visitation and Possession
  • Waste / Fraud
  • Witnesses

Archives

  • April 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • February 2016
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
    • Home
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • Site Map

    17207 Feather Craft Lane, Webster, Texas 77598

    © 2013 The Enos Law Firm, PC. All rights Reserved.