Law Offices Of Greg Enos

Galveston divorce lawyer | Galveston divorce attorney | Child custody lawyers Galveston

281-333-3030

Divorce and Child Custody

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • PAYMENT
  • About
    • Greg B. Enos
    • Paul Enos
    • Shandon Tonry
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • Galveston Divorce Attorneys
  • Divorce
    • Uncontested Divorce
    • Divorce Process
    • Divorce FAQS
    • Divorce for Business Owners
    • Divorce for Physicians and Dentists
    • Property Division
    • The Family House
    • Taxes & Divorce
    • Alimony
    • Adultery
  • Custody
    • Child Custody Questions
    • Child Support
    • Custody Evaluation
    • International / Interstate Custody Disputes
    • When a Child Can Choose?
  • Mongoose
  • Blogs
  • Links
    • Links
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • The Mongoose
    • School Districts
    • Galveston Co. Courts
    • Harris Co. Courts
  • Videos

Dec 21

How to Make Millions from Abused Children & Taxpayers

Reprinted from the August 13, 2014 Mongoose.  There can be no doubt: Gary Polland is a smart, successful lawyer who knows how to make a lot of money from the practice of law.  Polland is politically powerful and able to influence and profit from every Republican primary election.  Polland should be your hero and role model if high income and political influence are your goals in life.

I asked a bunch of attorneys with experience in CPS cases how much they guessed Gary Polland had been paid in four and a half years for court appointments. Their guesses ranged from $300,000 – $700,000.  They were totally floored to hear that Polland had been paid $1.9 million by Harris County since January 1, 2010 for court appointments.   Just to be very clear, that is taxpayer dollars being paid to this one man for government court appointments only.  It does not count the many cases where Polland was appointed by judges but paid by private parties.

 My investigation into this incredible situation has just begun, but here is what I know:

Polland has enormous political influence in Harris County Republican primaries, especially with judges, because he is one of the “Big Three” endorsers.  It is virtually impossible to win a Harris County GOP judicial primary, even for an incumbent, without at least two of three endorsements from Hotze, Lowry or Polland.   Unlike Hotze or Lowry, Polland is an attorney.  Click here to see who Polland endorsed in the 2014 GOP primaries.

In CPS cases, where the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services is a party, the courts are required to appoint attorneys for the children and for indigent or absent parents.  The child’s attorney in CPS cases is called an “attorney ad litem.”  Each judge has near total freedom to choose the attorneys who are appointed in CPS cases.  Attorneys appointed in CPS cases are paid by Harris County after a voucher signed by the lawyer “upon penalty of perjury” is approved by the Judge.  Click here to see a very small sample of CPS vouchers submitted by Mr. Polland. Note the charges for “travel for and conduct home visit and prepare report with photo’s” on each invoice.

Texas Family Code Sec. 107.004(d)(1) states:

 (d)  Except as provided by Subsection (e),an attorney ad litem appointed for a child in a proceeding under Chapter 262 or 263 [CPS cases] shall: (1)  meet before each court hearing with: (A)  the child, if the child is at least four years of age; or (B)  the individual with whom the child ordinarily resides, including the child’s parent, conservator, guardian, caretaker, or custodian, if the child is younger than four years of age; and (2)  if the child or individual is not present at the court hearing, file a written statement with the court indicating that the attorney ad litem complied with Subdivision (1).


Attorneys appointed on CPS cases are paid a  lower hourly rate than lawyers in private cases are paid.  For example, I charge my clients $350 per hour for my work in divorce and child custody cases.  Harris County pays CPS attorneys hourly rates which range from $75 to $125 per hour, depending on the specific service provided.  Pay for trials is $300 to $500 per day.  Young attorneys, who need experience and who want any paying case they can get, often seek CPS appointments.  These young attorneys work hard to impress the judges and, because they are new, do not take CPS clients for granted.  Massive amounts of appointments for just a few older, politically connected attorneys, take away from younger attorneys this opportunity to gain experience, help children and make a little money.

Most importantly, representation of abused children in CPS cases is not supposed to be an “assembly line” business to enrich the politically connected.  CPS work takes time, dedication and focus on a few children at a time.

The $1.9 million paid to Polland by Harris County does not include what Polland has been paid in private cases by the parties where he was appointed a mediator or amicus attorney by a judge.  In non-CPS child custody cases, the attorney appointed to represent a child is usually called an “amicus attorney.”

The vast majority of amicus attorney appointments in family cases in Harris County are not reported as required.  Texas Supreme Court Order No. 07-9188 and Section 71.035(b) of the Texas Government Code require each district clerk and county clerk to prepare a monthly report listing each fee paid in the amount of $500 or more for each appointment made by a judge of any district, county, or probate court, a court master, or court referee of a person to a position for which any type of fee may be paid in a civil case, probate case, or proceeding governed by Titles 1, 2, or 4 of the Texas Family Code.

The reports from Harris County does not include most private case appointment fees in civil cases.  However, the current report from the Texas Judicial Council shows, for example, that Polland was paid $5,143.00 in May 2014 in cause no. 2013-19426 where Civil District Judge Jeff Shadwick appointed Polland to be an attorney ad litem in an injury case.  Polland in 2010 in Mr. Shadwick’s first race for judge endorsed Shadwick.

Judge Lombardino just appointed Polland as amicus attorney, for example, in July 2014 in Cause No. 2014-35039 (a private custody case) and ordered an initial fee of $1,750.  Judge Denise Pratt in October 2013 (when she was seeking Polland’s endorsement) appointed Polland in Cause No. 201340272 and ordered that Polland be paid an initial fee of $5,000.  The fees in those cases were not reported by the District Clerk.  These are just a few examples of many appointment fees Polland has been paid in private civil cases. An amicus attorney in some custody cases is paid $30,000 or more by the parents.  Polland could easily be making tens of thousands of dollars per month from appointments in private cases and there is no way of knowing because judges, attorneys and the District Clerk are not complying with the Texas Supreme Court order and Government Code requirement to report such fees.

Mr. Polland is also often appointed to represent indigent defendants by criminal judges in Harris County. Appointed criminal defense lawyers are also paid by the county. For example, in June 2014, Polland was ironically appointed in the 351st Criminal District Court to represent a woman charged with prostitution (3 or more priors) in Case No. 143094001010-3.  A search of the District Clerk’s website for Polland’s bar number (16095800) shows dozens of criminal cases where Polland was appointed to represent defendants.

The $1.9 million Polland has been paid by Harris County since January 1, 2010 works out to $8,119.66 per week.  Divided by $125 per hour (the minimum and usual non-trial hourly rate for CPS cases), that is 65 hours of billed legal work per week, every week, 52 weeks per year with no vacations or holidays.  That would leave Mr. Polland very little time for his private appointments, mediations and civil cases where a client actually hires him.  In contrast, for my clients, I work 7 – 10 hours per day but I usually bill a total of 4 – 6 hours per day.  I clearly could learn a lot from Mr. Polland on how to efficiently bill for my time.

Every two years, Polland makes a lot of money from his business, Conservative Media Properties, LLC, doing business as the Texas Conservative Review, which endorses candidates in Republican primaries.  Candidates give Polland money to pay for his mailers and local judicial candidates almost have to pay Polland because voters simply cannot know which of the dozens of judicial candidates are qualified.  In election season, judges come to the attorneys asking for contributions, except for Polland.  Unlike the rest of us, Polland is able to go to the judges and ask them for money.  He is in a truly unique and powerful position.

My next issue will attempt to analyze which judges are appointing Polland and which paid his for-profit business for “advertisements” in his endorsement newspaper.  For the next few months, a special feature in this newsletter will list each new appointment in family courts Polland gets and which judge appointed him.  The judges who are appointing Polland are going to feel the spotlight even if they are unwilling to publicly explain why they choose him out of the hundreds of lawyers who seek appointments.

You will soon see a day by day analysis of the fee vouchers Polland has submitted for payment so we can see how many hours he is actually billing for all cases for each day (something each judge reviewing individual vouchers would not know).
However, to be fair to Mr. Polland, I am inviting him to write an explanation of his massive fees paid by county taxpayers and I will print verbatim what he has to say in my next newsletter.  I do ask Mr. Polland to include answers to these specific questions:

  1. How do you explain to fiscally conservative Republicans how one man could be paid $1.9 million by the county in four and a half years?  Did you know that is roughly how much the United States pays the President?
  2. When you bill the county for 5.0 hours almost every time for home visits with the children you represent, are you personally going to see the kids?
  3. Do you agree that the Texas Family Code, Sec. 107.004(d)(1), requires the attorney appointed to represent children in CPS cases to personally visit the child at home before every court hearing?  Does this law allow a non-lawyer or an attorney who is not the amicus appointed by the judge to conduct these mandatory home visits?
  4. Do your bills to the county include any charges for other attorneys or even non-lawyers to perform these home visits?  If so, do the judges know you are doing this?
  5. Does every single voucher you sign when you request fees for court appointments state that you certify “under penalty of perjury” that the County Auditor can rely on the information you provide?  Are these payment vouchers a “government record?”
  6. Do almost all of your appointments in CPS cases come from just a few judges?  If so, why?
Mr. Polland: write a defense of your “get rich off the tax payers and appointments from the judges who depend on me for endorsements” business model and I will print it verbatim in my next newsletter.  Please answer my questions and point out any part of the above story that is incorrect.  The hundreds of lawyers who aspire to help people, make decent incomes and uphold the integrity of our judicial system all want to learn from you!

Greg Enos – The Anti-Polland

All fans of Star Trek have heard of “matter” and “anti-matter.”  I am the “anti-Polland,” not because I am against him or harbor any ill-will toward him.  I do not know him personally and he is probably a smart, fun guy.  I am proudly the “anti-Polland” because we are so different.

I rely on private enterprise and paying clients for my business.  Polland makes the vast majority of his large income from taxpayers and judicial appointments.

I am very involved in politics, like Polland, but it costs me a lot of money every election.  In contrast, Polland makes money off elections.

I do not handle CPS cases and, except for Judge Roy Moore once per year, I do not accept appointments from judges.

Polland makes his money off the system.  I spend my money and a ridiculous amount of my time criticizing the system and trying to reform it (which explains why I have been up by 4:30 a.m. three days in a row working on this newsletter).

Polland is a Republican and calls himself, “conservative.”   I am a Democrat who is very liberal on social issues, even though I work with and support Republican officeholders all the time.  The Republican candidates I supported this election cycle got my help, not a bill for payment.  I held fundraisers for Republicans, contributed money, used my office for phone banking and spent Election Day at a voting place.  In short, I actually tried to help candidates instead of just counting the cash I received from them.

I worry about abused children, honest government and how taxpayers’ money is being spent, so maybe that makes me the true conservative.  The integrity and reputation of our judicial system is truly important to me.  If Ronald Reagan in his prime came back to life and visited the Harris County family and juvenile courts and read this newsletter, I bet the “Gipper” would agree with me that this entire situation is just not right.

Category:Amicus Attorneys, Court Appointment Abuse, Gary Polland, Harris County, Judge Problems | Tags: CPS amicus, Gary Polland

Recent Posts

  • Who Moves Out of the House During Divorce?
  • How to Prepare for Your First Divorce Mediation Session
  • Donors Hold Off on Donation Until Beto O’Rourke Decides to Run
  • Laudanum
  • Election 2018

Categories

  • Agreement Incident to Divorce
  • Alcoholism and Drug Addiction
  • Amicus Attorneys
  • Attorney Disqualification
  • Attorney's Fees
  • BAKER STREET BAZAAR
  • Book Review
  • Business Valuation
  • Characterization
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Community Property
  • Constitutional Rights
  • Court Appointment Abuse
  • Crimes in the courtroom
  • Criminal law and family law
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Dismissal summary judgment
  • Divorce
  • Domestic Violence
  • Doug York
  • E-Filing
  • E-Filing and Service
  • Election 2018
  • Electronic Evidence
  • Enforcement
  • Enos Legal Directories
  • Evidence
  • First Divorce
  • Galveston County
  • Gary Polland
  • Good Judges
  • Grandparents' custody and visitation
  • Harris County
  • Hearsay
  • Illegal Evidence
  • Injunctions
  • Injury Settlements in Divorce
  • Intervention
  • Judge Alicia Franklin
  • Judge Denise Pratt
  • Judge Problems
  • Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc
  • Julia Maldonado
  • Jury Trial
  • Law firm billing
  • Local Legal News
  • Mandamus
  • Modification
  • Mongoose Blog
  • Orders entry nunc pro tunc
  • Pleadings
  • Poetry and Prose
  • Politics and elections
  • Possession and visitation
  • Property Division
  • Recusal
  • Reimbursement
  • Religion and Philosophy
  • Rules of Civil Procedure
  • Separate Property
  • Spousal Maintenance (Alimony)
  • Ted Cruz
  • Temporary Orders
  • Tracing Separate Property
  • Trial
  • trial by consent
  • TRUMP REALITY
  • Uncategorized
  • Undivided Assets
  • US Supreme Court
  • Useful forms
  • Valuation
  • Venue and Transfer
  • Visitation and Possession
  • Waste / Fraud
  • Witnesses

Archives

  • April 2022
  • April 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • February 2016
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
    • Home
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • Site Map
    facebook twitter

    17207 Feather Craft Lane, Webster, Texas 77598

    © 2013 The Enos Law Firm, PC. All rights Reserved.

    Popup Content