Law Offices Of Greg Enos

Galveston divorce lawyer | Galveston divorce attorney | Child custody lawyers Galveston

281-333-3030

Divorce and Child Custody

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • PAYMENT
  • About
    • Greg B. Enos
    • Paul Enos
    • Shandon Tonry
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • Galveston Divorce Attorneys
  • Divorce
    • Uncontested Divorce
    • Divorce Process
    • Divorce FAQS
    • Divorce for Business Owners
    • Divorce for Physicians and Dentists
    • Property Division
    • The Family House
    • Taxes & Divorce
    • Alimony
    • Adultery
  • Custody
    • Child Custody Questions
    • Child Support
    • Custody Evaluation
    • International / Interstate Custody Disputes
    • When a Child Can Choose?
  • Mongoose
  • Blogs
  • Links
    • Links
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • The Mongoose
    • School Districts
    • Galveston Co. Courts
    • Harris Co. Courts
  • Videos

Dec 21

Are Pleadings Even Needed in Family Court?

At least in the counties contained within the Houston First and Fourteenth Courts of Appeals, family court judges cannot grant relief unless there are pleadings asking for that relief or unless the issue was tried by consent. A recent case provides a surprisingly broad view of what constitutes a “pleading” that can justify granting relief not explicitly mentioned in the current petition.

I represented the father who won on appeal in Flowers v. Flowers, 407 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.) and that case holds:

1.     A family court cannot grant relief unless there are pleadings asking for the relief or the issue was tried by consent.  The Rules of Civil Procedure apply in family cases, even those involving children.

2.     An issue is not tried by consent if it is never mentioned or discussed at trial.

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals in May 2014 reaffirmed the basic notion that relief cannot be granted without pleadings requesting the relief or trial by consent in In re A.D., No. 14-12-00914-CV (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 5/6/2014)(no pet.).   This case, however, allowed the trial judge to rely on motions for temporary orders and not the current pleading to justify granting the mother only supervised visitation.

The Houston First Court of Appeals and numerous other courts of appeals in the last 20 years have also held that there must be pleadings or trial by consent in order to grant relief in a child custody case. See e.g.,  In re Sanner, No.(Tex. App.- Houston [1st Dist.] May 20, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.)(“without proper pleadings, the trial court exceeded its authority by modifying and reforming some of the conservatorship and possession provisions of its prior orders…”).

Old fogeys and those without the ability to determine if cases have been overruled or bypassed by changes to the Texas Family Code might cite Leithold v. Pass, 413 S.W.2d 698 (Tex. 1967) and its progeny, which appear to apply very relaxed (or even non-existent) pleading requirements in child custody cases. An example of this old line of cases  said,”… the paramount concern is the best interest of the child, and the niceties of the procedural rules of pleading will not be used to defeat that interest.” Boriack v. Boriack, 541 S.W.2d 237, 242 (Tex. Civ. App.-Corpus Christi 1976, writ dismissed) (trial court did not err in ordering wife to pay child support even though pleadings did not request support). The Houston Fourteenth Court of Appeals, in Baltzer v. Medina,  240 S.W.3d 469, 746 (Tex. App.- Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, no pet.)(note 5) explained that the Leithold decision was basically overruled when the Texas Family Code was enacted.

Some less informed courts of appeals continue to follow the 1967 Leithold case as if the Texas Family Code had never been adopted.  In re O’Neal, No. 07-13-003358-CV (Tex. App. – Amarillo 12/23/2013) (mem. op.)(orig. proc.) is a recent example.  The Amarillo Court of Appeals, whose law books only go up to the late 1960’s apparently, granted mandamus on the trial court imposing a new geographic residence restriction without finding the child was in danger.  However, the court rejected the mother’s argument that the father had no pleadings asking for the relief he received in temporary orders, citing cases from 1937 and 1967 that technical rules on pleadings are not followed in child custody cases.

ProDoc and standard State Bar forms for petitions and counterpetitions do not include very specific requests for relief.  The best and safest practice is for attorneys to add a specific list of all relief they seek for their clients in their pleadings and responses to requests for disclosure.

Click this link to download my complete article: Article: Are Pleadings Even Needed in Family Court?

Category:Pleadings, Rules of Civil Procedure | Tags: pleadings in family court

Recent Posts

  • Who Moves Out of the House During Divorce?
  • How to Prepare for Your First Divorce Mediation Session
  • Donors Hold Off on Donation Until Beto O’Rourke Decides to Run
  • Laudanum
  • Election 2018

Categories

  • Agreement Incident to Divorce
  • Alcoholism and Drug Addiction
  • Amicus Attorneys
  • Attorney Disqualification
  • Attorney's Fees
  • BAKER STREET BAZAAR
  • Book Review
  • Business Valuation
  • Characterization
  • Child Custody
  • Child Support
  • Community Property
  • Constitutional Rights
  • Court Appointment Abuse
  • Crimes in the courtroom
  • Criminal law and family law
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Dismissal summary judgment
  • Divorce
  • Domestic Violence
  • Doug York
  • E-Filing
  • E-Filing and Service
  • Election 2018
  • Electronic Evidence
  • Enforcement
  • Enos Legal Directories
  • Evidence
  • First Divorce
  • Galveston County
  • Gary Polland
  • Good Judges
  • Grandparents' custody and visitation
  • Harris County
  • Hearsay
  • Illegal Evidence
  • Injunctions
  • Injury Settlements in Divorce
  • Intervention
  • Judge Alicia Franklin
  • Judge Denise Pratt
  • Judge Problems
  • Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc
  • Julia Maldonado
  • Jury Trial
  • Law firm billing
  • Local Legal News
  • Mandamus
  • Modification
  • Mongoose Blog
  • Orders entry nunc pro tunc
  • Pleadings
  • Poetry and Prose
  • Politics and elections
  • Possession and visitation
  • Property Division
  • Recusal
  • Reimbursement
  • Religion and Philosophy
  • Rules of Civil Procedure
  • Separate Property
  • Spousal Maintenance (Alimony)
  • Ted Cruz
  • Temporary Orders
  • Tracing Separate Property
  • Trial
  • trial by consent
  • TRUMP REALITY
  • Uncategorized
  • Undivided Assets
  • US Supreme Court
  • Useful forms
  • Valuation
  • Venue and Transfer
  • Visitation and Possession
  • Waste / Fraud
  • Witnesses

Archives

  • April 2022
  • April 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • February 2016
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
    • Home
    • Blog
    • Contact Us
    • Map
    • Site Map
    facebook twitter

    17207 Feather Craft Lane, Webster, Texas 77598

    © 2013 The Enos Law Firm, PC. All rights Reserved.

    Popup Content